Reliable Sources: The Story of David Gerard — LessWrong
Logged without notes.
Claude
Summary. The post traces the career of David Gerard, a Wikipedia editor and blogger (RationalWiki, "Attack of the 50-Foot Blockchain") who has spent over a decade shaping Wikipedia's coverage of cryptocurrency, effective altruism, and the rationalist community. It shows how he used Wikipedia's "reliable sources" policy both as a shield and a weapon — citing his own outside writing as authoritative, coordinating with allies to keep hostile framings in place, and outlasting more casual editors who tried to correct the record. The piece treats this as a case study in how a single sufficiently persistent, ideologically motivated actor can effectively capture a supposedly neutral gatekeeping mechanism over a long enough timescale.
Related
- capture of Wikipedia's "reliable sources" gatekeeping by a single persistent editor ↔ anti-misinformation platforms favoring existing orthodoxy over new knowledge (Taking money seriously — LessWrong) · Both show how gatekeeping systems built to filter out misinformation end up entrenching whoever already holds the pen, favoring incumbent orthodoxy over accurate but unfamiliar claims.
- an editor's own outside writing becoming Wikipedia's cited authority ↔ bureaucratic magic in which the form is the content (Bureaucracy is a world of magic) · Wikipedia's citation requirement, like notarization, checks that a source-shaped object exists rather than verifying the underlying truth, which is exactly the gap Gerard's self-referential sourcing exploited.